Admit it – at least once in your life you’ve wanted to learn how to do mind control and manipulate the thoughts of others.

Maybe you wanted your kid to do the chores without whining. Perhaps you wanted your wife to change her mind about the expensive purchase you’ve been eyeing. Or you could be sitting in your ho-hum office, putting in overtime while your co-workers skate by.

But what if you could change those around you? What if you knew how to do mind control in a covert way?

We’re not talking about cosmic superhuman powers. You’re not going to walk into work tomorrow and suddenly put everyone in a trance so they follow your commands like robotic soldiers. We’re not talking about brainwashing, either.

You don’t need harsh tactics of fear and manipulation to know how to do mind control and convince others to do your will. And you don’t need supernatural forces. All you need is control of your own mind and the ability to understand the minds of others. Once you learn how have full control of these things, you can learn how to do mind control that will change your life.

The human mind is tricky business, but by constantly sharpening your mind-control skills, you can learn how to break through to others’ subconscious in order to reformat how they think and consequently, how they behave.

Knowing how to do mind control on others is a powerful skill. It may seem too intimidating for you to master, but don’t worry. All you need to do to become a mind-control master is get your foot into the door of other people’s subconscious. Here’s how:

Display an air of authority and control

To be able to work your mind-control techniques, people have to listen to you. Do you think they’re going to listen to the wallflower in the corner or the shy guy shrinking by the watercooler? No. They want to look up to people of authority. They give respect to those who seem to have it all together.

Why? It’s simple – that’s what they want, too. Once they feel comfortable and enamored of you, they begin to drop the shield that guards their subconscious, which gives you full entry. Knowing how to break the armor is key to knowing how to do mind control.

Push buttons

This doesn’t mean you have to throw people into a fit of rage over some hot political issue. It simply means understanding what makes people tick. Get to know their motivations and passions. Once you do, subtly push those buttons until you’re controlling their thoughts.

If you have their trust, they will gradually open themselves to you without even realizing it. It’s then that they are vulnerable to your suggestions and influence.

Placate

Another benefit of knowing what people’s personal values and motivations are is determining how to control their minds by placating them. This means making covert references to issues or topics they feel emotional about

When they see that you share, understand or appreciate their thoughts or ideas, they begin to feel like you’re a confidant. They will fixate on that certain topic, which gives you even more freedom to break through the subconscious shield. To know how to do mind control, you must appreciate the art of humoring people.

Exercise your right to be silent

Silence is a powerful thing, much more powerful than people realize. You certainly don’t want to be the tight-lipped party pooper in the group, but you do want to be the person who knows how to do mind control techniques by intentionally utilizing the right to remain silent.

How? When involved in a serious or deep conversation with someone, don’t trip over their words. Don’t interrupt. Don’t even start talking as soon as they stop. At moments in the conversation, be completely silent. At some point you’ll need to say something of course, but in those few seconds of discomfort, they’re likely to fill the space with more words. The more they talk, the more disarmed they become.

All these techniques should help you sneak your way into a person’s subconscious, making them available to your influence. When you know how to do mind control, it’s clear that you harness a fascinating power.

Article Source: Article Brain

People spend a considerable amount of time buying products and browsing the websites on the Internet. By using behavioral targeting, many advertisers have an incredible amount of information available and completely understand the buying patterns of potential customers on the internet including which products they don’t like and which products they do. The businesses that advertise are so motivated that many of them report that they will try some type of targeted advertising. Almost 50% of these businesses reported this advertising will include most of the funds that they spend on advertising. About 83% of the businesses that advertise in the United States use behavioral targeting.

There are some strategies that should be used for behavioral targeting. The first thing that should be considered is the context of the advertisement. Behavioral targeting doesn’t mean that the targeting should be contextual. However, you won’t get the attention of potential customer if the advertisements on your website aren’t in some way related to the context of your website. The potential customers should be able to read the content of your website and the advertisements should also be related to the content. This makes it easier for your potential customers to understand that there is a call to action, and they can certainly take advantage of that.

The next strategy that should be considered is the implications of the regulations about privacy that some businesses are implementing. This is accomplished by placing a logo in an advertising banner for a price that will send a message out to potential customers that the entire process of collecting their personal information transparent which provides them with control about how they are to be used. However, most potential customers don’t realize what these logos are all about and there aren’t statistics that are relevant with regard to the rate of interaction rates when the logos were used.

This strategy is all about treating behavioral targeting differently than behavioral retargeting. These two definitely have different characteristics, although they are somewhat alike. Retargeting will certainly get a higher percentage of engagement and direct response from your potential customers. The reason for this is that the potential customers have already shown some interest before, but they just haven’t responded the way that the owner of the website wants them to. Behavioral retargeting and targeting needs to be leveraged separately, or else retargeting should certainly be used. This provides additional insight into your brands from your customers. You can also retarget your customers based on the way that they responded to your emails, for example, by their keyword searches.

The next strategy is to learn as much as you can about the insight that your potential customers have with regard to the products you are selling. Potential customers need to be the primary interest and they need to be the ones that cause you to post advertisements that are relevant to the content of your website. You need to study the profiles of your potential customers and be as specific as you can when targeting them concerning their credit scores and the content that they share.

Finally, you need to do a considerable amount of testing to determine the real performance of behavioral targeting on your website. Results can vary considerably for different brand types, publishers, and networks. This is the same with other targeting methods on the Internet. It requires a lot of testing.

Click here for more information about behavioral targeting.

Article Source: http://www.articlebrain.com

http://io9.com

A high school in Mocoa, Colombia recently hired hypnotist Miller Zambrano Posada to entertain a group of 590 youth for a student fun day.

For 700 pesos (40¢), the students were promised clowns, jugglers, and a mesmerizing display of casual mind control. What they got instead was a group freak-out. Reports Hispanically Speaking News:

Twelve kids were called to the stage, and then four were returned to their seats; the remaining eight were put into trance by Zambrano with hand movements, deep eye contact and a monotone voice.

Zambrano made them lift their arms, walk in circles, cry like babies, laugh hysterically, bark like dogs, act like chickens and whatnot. Students laughed and clapped at the end of the show and when Zambrano left the stage, the students were ushered back to their classrooms.

Suddenly, as the students walked back, several students developed bizarre symptoms. Police at the scene reported some of the students were crying, others dived into the ground for no reason, others hit their chest with their palms. One girl went as far as to scream that she was seeing the devil, and before too long a larger group of kids went into a mass panic attack.

Strangely enough, only one of the 36 girls and 5 boys affected, had shared the stage with the hypnotist, who was put in police custody as parents, students and a few teachers were accusing him of witchcraft.

Once the mass hysteria subsided, psychologists diagnosed the students with “collective neurosis induced by the hypnosis event” and noted that several of the affected students exhibited signs of epilepsy. The hypnotist, who was placed in police custody, claims to have never seen this sort of mass hysteria through his years of performing. It’s unclear why authorities haven’t implicated the clowns in this psychic meltdown. After all, kids hate clowns.
= = =

This is a great time to plug the Mind Control Hypnosis Seminar.

Click the Image and Find Out More.

Editor’s Note: I was contacted by the writer of this e-mail last year. She has only recently re-established contact with me after an absence for some months. I’ve chosen a pen name for her until I find out whether she wants to use her real name or not. She is one of many victims of mind control programming who contact me with their stories because of the articles on mind control that are posted at my web site. In most cases, victims who recover their memories of abuse have tried to go to political or law enforcement authorities to complain, but they are either patronized with do-nothing promises or rebuffed outright; usually the latter. If the person winds up in a psychiatric facility or hospital, they will usually be reprogrammed and sent on their merry way. Some people involved in this world essentially decide to join the Dark Side and are willing participants, while others -once they begin to realize what they are involved in-will rebel and want to break away from their family’s involvement with the Illuminati. Of course, the majority who keep their mouth shut do so out of abject fear of punishment, or cut off from financial support, etc. A certain percentage, however, become so disgusted with the evil of it all, that they bolt, no matter what the consequences may be. These are the people I hear from.

This writer’s victimization began with her parents in her earliest childhood, as is the case with most victims of mind control traumatizing and programming. The victim chosen for lifelong ‘service’ to their Illuminati handlers is at least the third generation to be traumatized and programmed. That means that the parents themselves were programmed, as were their parents.

The Illuminati has infiltrated very strata of American society with these mind controlled victims/participants. A partial list would include lawyers, doctors, psychiatrists, judges, talk show hosts, politicians, clergy, scientists, law enforcement, military, journalists, news casters, film makers, actors, etc., etc. There is no area of influence or power that isn’t thoroughly infiltrated by the Illuminati with their mind controlled ‘assets,’ as the CIA and other intelligence agencies prefer to call them.

I will post more information from “Dalevans” in the near future, as she has opened up a window of revelations, much of it corroborated in the books on mind control programming written by Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier, but much of it new and unknown to me. …Ken]

By Dalevans

http://educate-yourself.org/mc/dalevansillumdogsprogrammingchildren13oct06.shtml

October 13, 2006

Ken,

I was just reading your article on the “Finders“.

I know a little about this…I know that the “training” begins at the age of one years old and the “rewards” of food, is a conditioning process,  one that you would use to condition a dog..

They follow the theories of B.F. Skinner.  And in one of his books, he talks about creating a pattern in which you look at every possible outcome to predict the future with. The white robes, of course, are the KKK…and in this type of training it would be the K-9′s…or “DOGS“. It’s a form of the KKK within Law Enforcement. My father and mother both were in Law Enforcement.

There is a ritual I remember in flash backs as three brown crosses horizontal instead of vertical, they form a mason symbol with a cross at the top point. There is a circle of people surrounding the crosses in various robes of different colors representing different levels of the order.

The “DOGS” come from an African system originally called Dogon.. You can research it to verify it…I don’t have the name of the source book where I found the most information in,  but, I will get it for you if you want.

I was intended to be a “Bitch” for the organization, which means I was to be a Bitch Goddess. I was supposed to perform the sacrifices and be worshiped for my power to kill. The theory is that all men are DOGS and all women are Bitches; they are just looking for the one in “Heat”. And when a Bitch is in heat, she throws off a scent. You’ve heard of pheromones? That is the purpose of molesting children;  it accelerates a girl’s puberty cycle.

She has her period younger and develops earlier when she has been molested. It also makes her either sexually promiscuous or sexually inhibited, depending on how the abuse was administered…if it was pleasant or painful. I don’t know how much you’ve heard of the DOGS or know about them…they are in the highest hierarchy of the Illuminati.

Thanks, Dalevans

German Shepherds

October 13, 2006

Ken,

I forgot to mention, regarding the “DOGS”, at least for the hierarchy level of the Illuminati, only German Shepherd (police dogs) are used. In other words, the commands that I was brainwashed and conditioned with are in a language I cannot consciously understand. They are in German., which is the Nazi regime, Hitler’s group.

Even though I am half Cherokee Indian, I was raised to be a warrior in a Nazi war…and, because I am half Indian, the “Nazis” I’m trained to “work for”, hate me. It’s playing one end against the middle; get rid of two birds with one stone. Let us destroy each other.

And who are the Nazi party? Law Enforcement. I’m trained to work with them, and they’re conditioned to hate me. It leaves me resentful, which turns me against them and them against me. Understanding this, it’s hard for me to know: which side am I on?

Everything I thought I believed in has turned around and it’s the opposite and I am trying to adjust after I lost so much.

Dalevans

 “… the experimenters will be particularly interested in dissociative states, from the abaissement de niveau mental to multiple personality in so-called mediums, and an attempt will be made to induce a number of states of this kind, using hypnosis.” 

From a declassified MK-ULTRA document referenced by researcher Arlene Tyner

By David McGowan

http://educate-yourself.org/mc/dmcgmindcontrol101july01.shtml

July 1, 2001

Although most Americans understandably have difficulty grasping the concept of ‘mind control,’ and find absurd the idea that it may in fact be possible to so completely ‘brainwash’ an individual that he or she is rendered an unwitting and unknowing slave programmed to perform at the command of others, the fact remains that U.S. intelligence services have devoted a considerable amount of time and money to developing just such an individual.

There is not space here to detail all the techniques and methods that have received attention from the CIA and its brethren, but the basic methodology was revealed decades ago by George Estabrooks – a prominent psychologist/hypnotist under contract to the intelligence services – in his book Hypnotism, first published nearly six decades ago, in 1943.

Therein, Estabrooks candidly acknowledges that his “main interest has always been the military application of hypnosis.” While ‘Esty’ notes in the book that the “intelligent reader … will sense that much more is withheld than has been told,” he nevertheless reveals enough information to construct a fairly accurate picture of the fundamentals of mind control.

What is needed is a subject suffering from what used to be termed Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD), and what is now termed Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID). This condition can already exist within the subject or can be created by the ‘therapist.’ In all cases, however, the condition is created by severe trauma – so severe in fact that the traumatic episode cannot be integrated into the experiences of the core personality.

Far and away the most common cause of MPD is early childhood abuse, often – but not always – inflicted by a parent or other adult guardian. As Dr. Frank Putnam stated in 1989: “I am struck by the quality of extreme sadism that is reported by most MPD victims. Many multiples have told me of being sexually abused by groups of people, of being forced into prostitution by family members, or of being offered as sexual enticement to their mother’s boyfriends. After one has worked with a number of MPD patients, it becomes obvious that severe, sustained, and repetitive child abuse is a major element in the creation of MPD.”

Amnesia Walls
When the abuse is of an extreme nature, the natural human reaction is to build a wall around such experiences, so to speak, by creating a separate and distinct personality to deal with future episodes of abuse. Once the core personality has been thus split, it is then possible to control one or more of the alters that have been created, without the conscious knowledge of the primary personality. This, according to Estabrooks, creates the “Super Spy,” willing to follow orders unquestioningly without even having awareness of doing so.

Estabrooks only alludes to the severe abuse that is required to create a true multiple, often referring to the trauma euphemistically as “a form of hypnotism.” At one point, for instance, he notes that “[multiple personalities] are caused by a form of hypnotism in the first place! We will see that emotional shock produces exactly the same results as hypnotism.” Later, he comes closer to the grim reality when he states: “multiple personality could be both caused and cured by hypnotism. Remember that war is a grim business. Suppose we deliberately set up that condition of multiple personality to further the ends of military intelligence.”

Elsewhere, Estabrooks acknowledges that he himself had written previously that: “everyone could be thrown into the deepest state of hypnotism by the use of what [I] termed the Russian method — no holds barred, deliberate disintegration of the personality by psychic torture … The subject might easily be left a mental wreck but war is a grim business.”

Indeed it is, though that hardly justifies Estabrooks’ position, especially considering that most mind control operations have little to do with military operations – at least not overt ones. Estabrooks also notes that children make especially good subjects, given that they “are notoriously easy to hypnotize.” This is a nice way of saying that children are particularly vulnerable to abuse and have more of a tendency to dissociate traumatic experiences, thereby creating alter identities that can then be exploited and controlled.

Years later, another CIA-connected psychiatrist/hypnotist named Paul Verdier wrote an obscure little book, entitled Brainwashing and the Cults: An Expose on Capturing the Human Mind, that echoed much of what Estabrooks had written. Verdier begins by acknowledging that: “It must be accepted that brainwashing … is now being used here by devious persons with personal gain in mind,” though he misrepresents who those “devious persons” are.

He then explains that the goal of mind control is to access those areas of the brain that are outside of the conscious control of the individual by circumventing the normal inhibiting response of the cerebral cortex: “an individual’s voluntary conscious self-control must be bypassed or short-circuited.”

In order to disable the brain’s “cortical block,” Verdier recommends alcohol, euphoric drugs, isolation, solitary confinement, and – “the most dramatic and unique item in the brainwashing arsenal” – hypnosis. All of these are methods that have been extensively tested by the CIA under the rubric of the MK-ULTRA program.

Verdier goes on to explain that to achieve truly lasting mind control requires the creation of “profound and deep emotional states.” Recommended are fear, shock and anxiety, which have “an intense disinhibitive effect on the human brain.” What this means, in essence, is that emotional trauma facilitates the accessing of dissociative states.

The most effective of the “profound and deep emotional states,” according to Verdier, is pain. The doctor explains that this is because, “according to the eminent neurologist, Dr. Wilder Penfield, sensations of pain from the muscular sensory system enter the sub-cortical brain regions directly.” Penfield was, it should be noted, an associate of medical torture expert and MK-ULTRA operative Dr. David Ewen Cameron.

Verdier makes clear that pain and fear are among the most effective tools in the MK-ULTRA toolbox when he steals a page from Estabrooks’ book: “Russian political scientists do support the belief that given enough punishment, all the people in any time or place are susceptible to hypnotic control” (this is, by the way, a very common form of agency disinformation – acknowledge the existence of mind control, but blame it all on those damn ‘communists’).

He also echoes Estabrooks’ belief that children are ideal candidates for mind control operations, stating – with apparent approval – that: “Brainwashing can be slow, insidious and sure when applied to children early in life.” He further adds that: “It is likely that there is a short period of time following corporal punishment when the child is in a state of decortication – hypnosis, so to speak. This is the ideal time to plant the positive instructions for better behavior in the future.” What the good doctor considers “corporal punishment” and “positive instructions” is left to the reader’s imagination.

The vulnerability of children is one of the reasons that the CIA and other intelligence agencies have played a key role in the creation of ‘mainstream’ satanic groups such as the OTO and the Temple of Set, as well as in denying the existence of underground satanic cults and satanic crime. These satanic groups have frequently served as agency fronts for mind control operations. The ugly reality is that, when it comes to severely traumatizing children, nothing compares to the stories told by those who have survived what has been termed satanic ritual abuse [SRA].

Interestingly, Verdier notes that: “One of the most pronounced emotional experiences that a human being can undergo is having his or her life threatened. Threats of death are used as a basic tool by brainwashing Communists. Even among them, however, this threat is used sparingly, for they know that humans quickly adapt to this type of threat, especially if it is repeatedly given but never carried out. In order to avoid this routinization of stressful emotional situations, they have been known to casually execute prisoners for the apparent effect it has on others.”

What Verdier attributes to those dreaded communists precisely mirrors the stories that have been told repeatedly by survivors of ritual abuse. They have spoken of receiving frequent death threats, against both themselves and their family members, and of having those threats reinforced by being forced to watch and even participate in the killing of others.

Of course, there has been a concerted effort to discredit all such stories, spearheaded by the False Memory Syndrome Foundation – a group led by a truly vile coalition of CIA-affiliated psychologists/psychiatrists and accused pedophiles. Also playing key roles in the movement to deny the validity of recovered memories of severe abuse are Paul and Shirley Eberle, authors of the supposedly authoritative book The Politics of Child Abuse.

The Eberles’ book attempts to blame all child abuse accusations and prosecutions on overzealous prosecutors, therapists and parents. This might be a little more credible if the Eberles themselves were not well known to Los Angeles police as distributors of child pornography, a fact that the media conveniently and consistently ignore while touting the Eberles as authorities in the field of child abuse.

Claims of ritual abuse, by the way, are certainly not a recent phenomenon. They actually have a long history, and were given legitimacy by no less an historical figure than Sigmund Freud. Over 100 years ago, Freud recognized such abuse to be the primary cause of the psychological problems he observed in his female patients, before he was forced by peer pressure to drop what was known as the ‘seduction theory.’

Author Kevin Marron notes that Freud was keenly aware of the marked “similarity between what [his patients] told him and the accounts of the witchcraft confessions of the 16th century.” In a letter to a colleague written in January of 1897, Freud pondered: “But why did the devil who took possession of the poor things invariably abuse them sexually and in a loathsome manner? Why are their confessions under torture so like the  communications made by my patients in psychological treatment?”

And why, indeed, are the communications made by Freud’s patients a century ago so like the stories told  today by ritual abuse survivors? Are we to believe that this is due to some sort of mass hysteria spanning generations –perhaps even spanning centuries? Or is it because, as the Chicago Tribune has noted: “According  to historians, satanic cults have been documented in Europe and America as far back as the 1600s.”

Has there always been something dark and evil lurking just out of sight, only occasionally raising its head – at which times its existence is denied, its perpetrators cast as victims, and its real victims mocked and ridiculed? To ponder such a question, alas, is to call into question some of our most basic beliefs about the nature of the world we live in – a decidedly unsettling venture.

Perhaps though, when viewed in the context of a state-sponsored mind control program, we can begin to understand not only why someone would be motivated to inflict such appalling levels of abuse on America’s children, but also why so much effort and disinformation would be put forth to discredit such claims if they are in fact valid.

And truth be told, the stories told by survivors tend to be self-discrediting. One of the benefits of cloaking  mind control operations in satanic rituals is that the operations are largely immune to disclosure. Even if an operation is uncovered – as was the case at the McMartin Preschool – the stories told by the children are so outlandish, so far removed from the world as we know it, that they are easily cast aside as the product of a child’s fertile imagination.

In May of 2000 though, a report commissioned by the United Kingdom’s Department of Health concluded that satanic ritual abuse was not, as an earlier report ordered by the Conservative government found in 1994, a “myth.” The Independent noted: “A specially commissioned government report will this week conclude that satanic abuse does take place in Britain. It will say that its victims have suffered actual abuse and are not suffering from ‘false memory syndrome.’”

The timing of the reporting on this landmark study, by the way, seemed to be deliberately intended to taunt the victims of such abuse. The story was published on April 30, 2000 – otherwise known as Walpurgisnacht (Night of the Witches) or Beltane, probably the most important of all the satanic holidays.

The co-author of the report was psychotherapist Valerie Sinason, who reportedly has treated 126 survivors of ritualized abuse. According to a report in the Guardian, Sinason said that “46 of her patients claimed to have witnessed murder of children or adults during ritual abuse ceremonies that had involved up to 300 people at a time. Some 70% of the reported abuse was carried out by paedophiles and the rest by satanists.”

The Independent added that sixteen of them also have claimed that “they had seen induced abortions or babies killed.” Sinason’s research has also led her to conclude that: “Some children are born for the purpose of abuse and are not registered on birth certificates” – a claim that has been made repeatedly by U.S. victims as well, and one that has been thoroughly ridiculed.

In a report from February of 2000, The Independent held that Sinason “said photographs showed horrific injuries to children and the existence of ceremonial sites with the remains of mutilated animals.” The same article noted that “Scotland Yard said it was also carrying out an investigation.”

It is unclear what the official response to the study was, or what the results of the investigation allegedly launched by Scotland Yard were. The media appears to have dropped the story just before the actual report was issued. Many readers of these press accounts were no doubt predisposed to dismiss Sinason and her fellow researchers as cranks.

Where exactly, they were left to ponder, is this alleged photographic evidence showing children with horrific injuries? And where is the evidence of ritual murders being performed? As it turns out, such evidence isn’t really all that difficult to find; as hard as it may be to grasp for readers conditioned to believe that all such stories are nothing more than ‘urban myths,’ photographic evidence of exactly that sort is being peddled all over the Internet.

Even with such evidence being widely circulated, many will still be tempted to discount the stories told by survivors of such abuse. Skeptics are advised to keep in mind the words of Detective Robert Simandl of the Chicago Police Department: “It’s difficult for us to believe such crimes are occurring, but they are, all over the United States.” And, apparently, all over Europe as well.

David McGowan

---

REFERENCES:
1. Al-Kurdi, Husayn “Messing With Our Minds,” Toward Freedom, May 1998
2. Anderson, Jon “Satanic Crime: Police Say the Devil Made Some People Do It,” Chicago Tribune, April 18,      1988
3. Brindle, David “Satanic Abuse Row Erupts,” Guardian UK, February 10, 2000
4. Estabrooks, George Hypnotism, Dutton, 1957
5. Goodchild, Sophie “Satanic Abuse No Myth, Say Experts,” The Independent (UK), April 30, 2000
6. Landsberg, Michelle “Incest: Stop the Nonsense and Get to the Difficult Truth,” The Toronto Star, February 4,      1996
7. Laurance, Jeremy “Therapist Revives Fears of Ritual Satanic Abuse,” The Independent (UK), February 10,      2000
8. Laurina, Maria “Paul and Shirley Eberle: A Strange Pair of Experts,” Ms. Magazine, December 1988
9. Lee, Martin and Bruce Shlain Acid Dreams, Grove Press, 1985
10. Marks, John The Search for the Manchurian Candidate, Times Books, 1979
11. Marron, Kevin Ritual Abuse, Seal Books, 1988
12. Newton, Michael Raising Hell, Avon Books, 1993
13. Tyner, Arlene “Mind Control Part 3: The Blowback Effect of Brain Tampering,” Probe Magazine, July-August, 2000
14. Verdier, Paul A. Brainwashing and the Cults, Wilshire Book Company, 1977

Web posted at: http://davesweb.cnchost.com/pedo0.htm